Low rake player takes out a high rake player ( the site is not going to get the money or portion of the money back. High rake player ( one who generates a lot of income for the site ) gets miracle turns or rivers ) Or incredible flops. Online poker is not is pre arranged on who is allowed to win or more importantly who is not allowed to win. FYI, went went this bad both online and live. I have gone over 40 and been in the 30's a few times over the years. Not cashing in 26 straight is not fun but not as bad as it could be. Over 1/2 the time i hit a downswing and I review my play i see what I was doing different. While I can understand your questions this is more like variance finally catching up to you or a small change in your game. To be honest cashing at the rate you played is unrealistic long term. If this is a proven room with a good reputation, then you are covered by a wave of dispersion (unfortunately in MTT it is very large), but I would not be so sure! My logical side says they don't care who wins or loses, they get their fee from all entrants but my paranoid side argues that if my play hasn't changed then how on earth did it go from steady winning to zero winning? I consistently am losing to 2 and 3 outers and runner runner flushes. I just bubbled a nightly tournament I play 3 consecutive nights which seems absurd. The longest I ever went before without cashing a tourn was maybe 10-12 tournaments, right now I'm at 26. Since then I have cashed exactly 1 time in 35 tournaments. I cashed about 1 out of every 6-7 tournaments played. Over 2+ years my play was consistently profitable, turning $100 into $1200. I play a small Canadian online site, tournaments only, low buyins of $5 or 10 that get 60-90 players. I never gave much credence to the many many internet poker conspiracy theories.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |